Archive For The “Trademark Enforcement” Category

New Year Greeting 2016<br /><span style='font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: teal;'>by H.C. Hwang</span>

New Year Greeting 2016
by H.C. Hwang

Reading Time: 4 minutes.

2016 New Year’s greeting

I hope this message finds you and your family in the best of health and spirits as you are receiving a bright New Year.

70th_logo_nobkgrnd_755x796-142x150There were many meaningful Moo Do events that took place worldwide throughout the year in 2015.

I would like to recognize some of them as we enter the New Year.

  1. The Moo Duk Kwan 70th year celebration in Korea (October 30th to November 1, 2015) in South Korea:  It was a powerful experience to see how the Founder Hwang Kee’s vision (from 1945) has grown over the 70 years since the Moo Duk Kwan inception.
    Members from different countries gathered at the mother land of the Art and strengthened their old friendships and made new friendships while sharing the same values and pride in the Moo Duk Kwan. It was an experience that strengthened our appreciation for our gift from the Founder and the Moo Duk Kwan patch, that has guided us toward our clear objectives.
    I invite you to join me in continuing our celebration of the 70th year of the Moo Duk Kwan® with our actions throughout 2016.
  2. 2007_FEDPATCH_CutOut_j_150x149The United States Federation successfully protected the identity of Moo Duk Kwan® which was built 70 years ago by the Founder Hwang Kee.
    The verdict and judgment was filed in favor of the plaintiff, the US Federation. This stands as an moo-duk-kwan-alumni-patches-various-v1a-cutout-600x600example that the US Federation will defend against trademark infringers as they have over the past 40 years, and they will prevail as they have in all cases.
    This action and verdict is a victory for all WMDK organizations and sends a clear message to those who infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. I hope all Moo Duk Kwan® Alumni embrace the spirit of “Only One Moo Duk Kwan” by recognizing the rich history of the Moo Duk Kwan. Our unity will strengthen our Moo Duk Kwan identity for all practitioners.
  3. Recognition of leaders who were great supporters for PVT II: Your Vision Tour (PVTII) was greatly inspiring, motivating, and supported the transition of our young leaders into roles that are important to the preservation of our art and the future of the Moo Duk Kwan.

    In Seok Kim
    (Dan Bon 12) who was a student of the Founder Hwang Kee.  He was an inspirational to his students by providing education about the uniqueness of Moo Duk Kwan

    Vic Martinov (Dan Bon 10189) who was a role model for anyone wishing to be a true Martial Artist and to understand the value of “Neh Ghang Weh Yu”. He understood the Moo Do and its application in life. He further shared himself by Action as well as great stories with others. He is my friend.

    Jong Kuk Hong (Dan Bon 15856) who I met mid 1960s in Korea and had served the Art. He shared many stories of the Moo Duk Kwan with his students.

    Jack Helfgott (Dan Bon 26104) who studied at the Springfield Headquarters Do-Jang on September 1980 with me. He was a great leader for youngsters through his teaching career as well as volunteer for whoever needs help and support.

    Carlos Schiavo (Dan Bon 34642) who was an excellent practitioner and was a role model for youngsters in Argentina. I have fond memories of training and personal time with him during his 5th Dan testing in Buenos Aires in 2014.

    These dedicated practitioners passed in 2015.  They will be remembered in the Moo Duk Kwan history as well as in our Vision Tour stories.  They were great contributors for the PVT II efforts and supporting our future young leaders.

    I am looking forward to your continuing participation in your Vision Tour and your support of our future leaders in 2016.

    Moo Duk Kwan Global Standardization Demonstration at 70th

    Moo Duk Kwan Global Standardization Demonstration at 70th

    Finally, I would like to recognize and celebrate the Moo Duk Kwan standardization worldwide. We had very little time to rehearse for the 70th Demonstrations and we also encountered some technical and administrative challenges during our preparations; however, all participants felt good about the demonstrations and received positive feed back from the audience,  especially from the other Martial arts practitioners who were in attendance.

    Moo Duk Kwan® standardization worldwide was the key element for the grand success of the 70th Demonstrations.  I am proud to be associated with this process.

    Thanks to the Founder’s teaching, his vision and the support of Moo Duk Kwan practitioners worldwide, the success of the 70th celebration was made possible.

    My family and I thank you and your family for the meaningful 2015.  We are looking forward the 2016 with your active participation.

    We trust you and your family had good holiday season and wish the best for the Happy New Year!

    Yours in Moo Duk Kwan,

    H. C. Hwang

Soo Bahk Do Institute

MOO DUK KWAN® Wins Landmark Trademark Infringement Case<br /><span style='font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: teal;'>Federal District Judge, Robert Mariani enforces Moo Duk Kwan® exclusive rights</span>

MOO DUK KWAN® Wins Landmark Trademark Infringement Case
Federal District Judge, Robert Mariani enforces Moo Duk Kwan® exclusive rights

Reading Time: 1

Moo_Duk_Kwan_Fist_Established_1945_2014_trans_300x319On August 17, 2015 Federal District Judge, Robert Mariani handed down a winning verdict for the MOO DUK KWAN® in the landmark trademark infringement case filed April 10, 2012  by the United States Soo Bahk Do Moo Duk Kwan Federation® protecting the MOO DUK KWAN® name and the fist and laurel leaves logo.

He has issued a permanent injunction restraining the trademark infringers and ANYONE ELSE acting in concert with them as well as a substantial monetary judgment against the infringers.

Click through to read more about the case.

Download (PDF, 65KB)

Moo Duk Kwan® Identity Defense FAQ<br /><span style='font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: teal;'>Frequently Asked Questions About The Kovaleski Lawsuit</span>

Moo Duk Kwan® Identity Defense FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions About The Kovaleski Lawsuit

Reading Time: 8 minutes.

[su_spoiler title="1. Who is the United States Soo Bahk Do Moo Duk Kwan Federation® suing?" style="modern-light"]

International Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan Association a.k.a Tang Soo Karate School, Inc. and Robert Kovaleski and Eric Kovaleski.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="2. Why are we suing them?" style="modern-light"]
Moo Duk Kwan Fist Logo

Moo Duk Kwan Fist Logo

November 9, 1945 in Korea Hwang Kee named his 1st martial art school Moo Duk Kwan® and began instructing his martial art system of Hwa Soo Do, then later Tang Soo Do.

1974-76 Hwang Kee led formation of the U.S. Federation and assigned it exclusive rights to the Moo Duk Kwan® name and logo for commerce in the United States

June 19, 1975 the initial election results were tallied and the 1st Charter Convention for the newly created United States Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan Federation® was scheduled for June 28, 1975.

June 26 ,1976,  the 501(c)(4) nonprofit United States Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan Federation® was incorporated and chartered as the only U.S. entity authorized by Moo Duk Kwan® Founder Hwang Kee to use his Moo Duk Kwan® martial art school name and his Tang Soo Do / Soo Bahk Do® martial art system name and content in commerce in the United States.

On multiple occasions since the Federation's inception, the Federation's Board of Directors have complied with its Charter provision to defend and protect from misuse the Moo Duk Kwan® name and logos associated with the established and well known reputation of Hwang Kee and the U.S. Federation.

Trademark Infringers and trademark counterfeitors use confusingly similar marks in a dishonest manner calculated for their advantage.

Trademark Infringers and trademark counterfeitors use confusingly similar marks in a dishonest manner calculated for their advantage.

October 2001, Robert and Eric Kovaleski , a.ka. Tang Soo Karate School (incorporated in September 1995,) filed an application to trademark International Tang Soo Do Moo Duk Kwan Association and the fist logo.

January 4, 2002 their application was rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for likelihood of confusion with existing registered trademarks including the Federation’s.

July 5, 2002 the Kovaleski’s application for trademark was abandoned.

October 2010 multiple websites and social media bearing the name and design which had been rejected by the USPTO came to the Federation’s attention.

October 29, 2010 a cease and desist notice was sent to the Kovaleskis by the Federation’s intellectual property attorney. An attorney for the Kovaleskis responded saying they needed more time to reply and then no further communication was forthcoming. This is not uncommon in these matters and typically indicates the infringing activity will eventually cease.

August 16 to 23, 2011 the Kovaleskis and a group visited Korea where they formed a relationship with Korea based World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation ( and unknown to the Federation at that time, the WMDKGF appointed Eric Kovaleski as USA East Coast Regional Representative on August 21,2011.

The World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation website states the motivation for incorporating (which they characterize as “formed with the permission of the Korean Government”) as”… Tragically our founder passed away in 2002. Before he passed on he ignored his original group of protégé's and handed control of his art of Soo Bahk Do to his son. This disrupted the harmony originally established and nurtured by him in the past. His older generation of students (ranging from age 80 to 89) established a corporation, the World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation…” In an interview Robert Kovaleski stated, "HC Hwang didn’t respect his seniors- Let’s just say that!”

November 10, 2011, but undiscovered at that time, Widmer Signs, a sign company in Scranton, PA, posted photos on Facebook of new signage bearing Federation Trademarks and indicated they were being made for the Kovaleskis in preparation for an event.

In February 2012 multiple Federation members received an event solicitation from the Kovaleskis which featured the name and design previously rejected by the USPTO. Federation members reported it was confusingly similar to the Federation’s trademarks. The literature indicated that the Kovaleskis were hosting World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation representatives including Yong Duk Kim Dan Bon #2 as President and Hee Suk Choi Dan #5 as Vice President to present seminars on May 10, 2012 in Dickson City, PA.

February 29, 2012 The Federation Board of Directors met and responded to member reports and Kwan Jang Nim’s request for prompt follow-up on this serious trademark infringement. The Board approved a motion for Appointed Director Phillip Bartolacci, Sa Bom Nim to reach out to the Kovaleskis and seek an amicable resolution within a few days with the stipulation that if that failed then the Federation’s attorney would be authorized to initiate legal action. The Kovaleskis were unreceptive to that outreach.

April 10, 2012 the Federation filed for a preliminary injunction in Federal court in Scranton, PA and a hearing was set for May 8, 2012.

May 3, 2012 the Federation Board held an emergency meeting and authorized the Executive Administrator, Phil Duncan to appear in court with Federation counsel, Chuck Kennedy on May 8, 2012 in Scranton, PA. During the injunction hearing, additional literature published by the World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation was procured and it pronounced Yong Duk Kim Dan Bon #2 and Hee Suk Choi Dan #5 as co-founders of the Moo Duk Kwan martial art school in 1945.

The Federation possesses evidence contradicting these claims including, but not limited to, photos and rank certification records issued by Hwang Kee to these men as his students (Hwang Kee's original records indicate Dan #5 for Choi Hee Suk, not Dan #3),  a sworn affidavit by Yong Duk Kim#2 notarized in 1983, stating that Hwang Kee was the sole Moo Duk Kwan founder, Hee Seok Choi's resignation from the Moo Duk Kwan in 1965, s 2004 letter from Yong Duk Kim Dan #2 disavowing World Moo Duk Won organizers at that time.

May 9, 2012 Federal Judge Mariani signed an order restraining the Kovaleskis from using our marks during their events May 10-12.

May 10-12, 2012 the Kovaleskis complied with the court order during their events; however, the representatives from the World Moo Duk Kwan General Federation did not, but they are not parties to this USA legal action.

October 16, 2014 Eric Kovaleski posted on Facebook that he had been appointed Vice President of the World  Tang Soo Do General Federation, Moo Duk Kwan in Seoul, Korea.

February 9th, 2015 is the trial date set by Federal Judge Mariani in Scranton, PA.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="3. Is the Federation seeking damages from the defendants?" style="modern-light"]


[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="4. Why didn’t the Federation pursue action years ago prior to this becoming a problem?" style="modern-light"]

Please refer to #2.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="5. I have seen others using the name Moo Duk Kwan®. What has been done in those cases?" style="modern-light"]

“Using” is an unspecific term that does not indicate the context of use which must be evaluated in order to determine what action, if any, is needed to protect the Federation’s intellectual property.

For example, if a student attends Harvard university and obtains a degree in education and is no longer enrolled at Harvard university and they display their Harvard degree certificate on their office wall or they wear a Harvard jacket as a Harvard alumnus, are those actions harmful?

Or if a Harvard university alumnus opens a tutoring center in their own name and uses their degree knowledge gained at Harvard university to tutor and teach students, is that action harmful?

However, if a Harvard alumnus opens a business using the name Harvard in their business cards, advertisements, on signs, on websites, on their application forms, on patches, products, certificates, etc. and thereby suggests and represents to the public that they are associated with, endorsed by or affiliated with Harvard university without a license to do so, is their action harmful?

In the latter case, Federal laws says, “yes” and provides penalties for those who use another’s trademark in a dishonest manner calculated for their own advantage. Such penalties are intended to protect the public from fraud and misrepresentation. When reports are received or discoveries are made where someone else is “using” the Moo Duk Kwan® name and fist logo, the circumstances are evaluated in order to determine what, if any, action is required to protect the Federation’s intellectual property, reputation, public goodwill and other interests.

Since 1976 the Federation has established a diligent history of evaluating and responding to numerous reports and discoveries of potential misuse of its intellectual property and of defending its interests as Founder Hwang Kee charged the Federation to do via provisions built into the Charter and Bylaws. Typically, unintentional infringers have voluntarily ceased their infringing activity after being notified. However, willful infringers seeking to use the Federation’s marks in a dishonest manner calculated for their advantage are not usually cooperative and some have required legal recourse in order to stop their activity. The Federation’s enforcement action outcomes and the parties involved are available through Board Directors except for those bound by a non-disclosure agreement.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="6. Is the Federation suing everyone who has ever used the Moo Duk Kwan® name?" style="modern-light"]

Please refer to #5.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="7. How is Dan Segarra involved in this and are we suing him, too?" style="modern-light"]

During the time period of gathering evidence toward trial, former Federation member and former Board Director, Dan Segarra, compiled a PDF document telling his personal opinion about a version of history that is favorable to the Kovaleski’s position and they entered his document into evidence.

No, the Federation has not initiated legal action against him at this time.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="8. Why should the Gup members have to pay legal defense when they see no benefit or even understand what the Federation is?" style="modern-light"]

Students training under Moo Duk Kwan® certified instructors in Moo Duk Kwan® certified studios and learning the Soo Bahk Do® martial art system are benefiting from the Federation’s existence as are their local communities and society in general.

The Federation is a nonprofit members’ organization and members' contributions, dues and fees are used to pursue the Federation’s chartered purposes including protection of intellectual property from misuse.

If some Gup members do not understand what the Federation is, then unfortunately they may not have been properly oriented when they were enrolled as Federation members and/or they may not have received the 170 page Federation Member manual which explains and educates members about the Federation and the value of membership in the community of practitioners who are the Federation.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="9. Why isn’t there a lawsuit being pursued in Korea instead?" style="modern-light"]

The U.S. Federation cannot speak for the Korean Federation.  The U.S. Federation is defending and protecting U.S. rights.

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="10. This doesn't affect my local school, why should I care about this?" style="modern-light"]

The reputation of every legitimate Moo Duk Kwan® alumnus and every certified instructor and studio is diminished by the distribution of counterfeit rank certificates, products, etc. bearing the Federation’s trademarks.

The identity of the Federation as represented by its trademarks is an important asset for the organization and the art. The reputation and value associated with well known brand names and logos are why unscrupulous individuals attempt to use them for their own advantage without a license from the owner.

Will you care if a competitor opens a school near you and advertises that they are a Moo Duk Kwan® martial art school and they say they provide the same Soo Bahk Do® training experience and the same rank certifications as you do?

[/su_spoiler] [su_spoiler title="11. What benefit is there in picking this fight?  It makes us look bad." style="modern-light"]

Defending and protecting that which belongs to one is not “picking a fight.” Observers who characterize a defensive response against bullying, trespassing, rights encroachment, etc. as “picking a fight” or “makes us look bad,” may not have adequate information to understand what transpired and resulted in the incident they are judging. This document provides relevant information that may help inform and educate interested parties about this case.

First, the Federation’s charter requires members to protect and defend the organization’s intellectual property.

Second, since 1976 Federation members have invested heavily in trademarks and service marks to exclusively identify the Federation as the singular source of services and products which meet the high quality standards of excellence that Founder Hwang Kee charged the Federation to adhere to.

Third, a unique identity is crucial to the long-term preservation of Founder Hwang Kee’s legacy so that it can be distinguished from imitators. Trademarks and service marks represent the source of products and services to the public and they provide assurances to the public that those employing them in commerce are legitimately certified school owners, instructors and students who have received rigorous, authentic training and education about the requirements, standards, attributes and characteristics expected in Moo Duk Kwan® martial art schools and thus make training in the Soo Bahk Do® martial art system unlike any other.


Download (PDF, 666KB)

Moo Duk Kwan® Supporters Defending Hwang Kee's Moo Duk Kwan® Legacy

If you are a Moo Duk Kwan® Member or Alumni who cares about the authenticity and legitimacy of your lineage, please help us preserve it.

Click to become a Moo Duk Kwan® Preservationist and be named in Hwang Kee's autobiography.

Phonies, Frauds and Thieves

Phonies, Frauds and Thieves

Reading Time: 3 minutes.

The trademark counterfeiting business is booming! Check out the trademark counterfeits at the bottom of this page.

Phonies, frauds and thieves are thriving in an industry that is driven by greed, disregard for the rights and reputations of others and by consumers with low self esteem.


Yes, you read correctly; consumers with low self esteem have been documented by researchers to be most susceptible to trafficing in the trademark counterfeiting trade.

There are entire books written about the The Psychology Behind Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting.

Some producers of counterfeit merchandise, counterfeit certificates and counterfeit diplomas have even attempted defending their illegal activity by claiming their counterfeits are produced to help increase low self esteem.

So following that logic, if you are feeling a bit low today, just hop online and buy yourself a Ph.D. or two from Harvard, Yale or any university that you feel will boost your self esteem the most. You might even pickup a knock-off Rolex watch as well and your self esteem will surely soar.  NOT according to researchers.

Unfortunately, for those who receive and/or purchase counterfeits, researchers have also determined that possession of counterfeits has unexpected long-term negative consequences on the possessors.

Counterfeit Rank Certificate

Counterfeit Rank Certificate

The phony diploma problem has become so pervasive in the USA (What does that imply about the state of American self esteem?) that when employers fail to conduct effective due diligence of a job applicant's credentials during the hiring process they can later find themselves facing even more serious issues such as whether or not the employer can legally terminate employee health care benefits which were acquired by the employee as a result of employee fraud during the application process. And the employee who acquired their job under fraudulent circumstances with a phony diploma or certificate can go to jail.

The Federal Trade Commission recommends a due diligence process for employers to protect themselves from job applicants seeking to defraud them during the application process. If fraud is not discovered during the initial stages, then it may continue for years.

In 2002 physics professor George Gollin became so incensed by the phony diploma businesses undermining and devaluing the validity and credibility of legitimate educational institution credentials that he helped the Secret Service nab a multimillion-dollar diploma mill.

Some states, such as Oregon and New Jersey, have made it a crime to use degrees from diploma mills, and others are considering such laws.

The martial arts industry also has its share of questionable certificate issuance practices by martial art schools and martial art instructors who willfully engage in trademark infringement and trademark counterfeiting and issue counterfeit certificates to students who seem happy to receive them, but in the case of martial art students that bliss is usually because ignorance is bliss.

A consumer who knowingly purchases a fake diploma or phony certificate from a vendor who is advertising them as phonies and fakes KNOWs that they are getting a fake and they enter into the transaction with the vendor with knowledge they are paying for a phony or a counterfeit.

However, when a martial art student is induced to enroll at a martial art school that is engaging in trademark infringement and trademark counterfeitingthe student/parent does NOT KNOW that they will be receiving counterfeit rank certificates and/or credentials in return for their tuition.

Therein lies an intentional misrepresentation of fact and/or the omission of fact by a martial art instructor that can set in place fraudulent circumstances for the consumer that may last for years.

So how can you know if you will be getting counterfeit or phony certificates before you enroll at a martial art studio?

Similar to the advice from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) we recommend that you:

  1. Identify
  2. Verify
  3. Testify



Just For Fun:

Here are some example fake brands and trademarks which are representative of the fine company you will be keeping with counterfeit rank certificates.

Images from:


The Martial Art Fraud website provides information intended to help you proactively 1) recognize and identify circumstances with a high potential for you to become a victim of fraud, 2) verify factual evidence of fraud and 3) report evidence of fraud to appropriate agencies and authorities. Disclaimer

Go Top

Federation Membership  Join or Renew